pomaire561This interesting article was in the Wall Street Journal today, titled “Google Slowly Moving Away from its “Addiction” to M&A Earn-Outs”.    An interesting thought, but hardly believable.  While I am sure that Google’s leaders have realized that they may have paid a little too much in some earn-out structures because they found out they were actually paying for their own goodwill, which accelerated the target’s success when taken under Google’s umbrella, I believe that this model will continue to be the favored structure of the M&A deals in the internet and tech space.  Of course, this is because the main assets being purchased in most cases are IP-intensive - i.e., hard to value without performance-based results.  Start-ups in this space just don’t have a track record to pay an up-front lump sum.  Still, I realize where Google is coming from on this position, and there is certainly a case by case balance to be found between cash/equity payments and earn-outs, when the milestones reached for those earn-outs are difficult to discern between the target’s success and the goodwill of the purchaser.

(On another note, I have decided to start using the photography of my sister, an extremely talented photographer, for pictures on this site.  She has taken amazing photographs from all over the world, and I would like to share them with the IP Prospective readers.  I hope you enjoy them as much as I do.  For her entire catalog, see her site at Captured by Leslie.)

This entry was posted on Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010 at 4:28 pm.
Categories: Portfolio Potential ~ by Ian McClure.

No Comments, Comment or Ping

Reply to “Phasing Out the “Earn-Out” M&A Model? Even When IP Is the Main Draw of the Target?”